Subscribe: RSS
  • Biotechnology
  • Cities
  • Climate change
  • Credit crisis
  • currencies
  • Energy
  • Geopolitics
  • Globalization
  • Growth and productivity
  • Health Care
  • Innovation
  • Internet
  • job creation
  • marketing
  • Organization
  • Social Entrepreneurs
  • Social Innovation
Tapping corporate expertise to improve lives
2 December 2011
  • Comment on this articleComment
  • Print this articlePrint
  • Link to this articleLink to this
  • Bookmark and Share this article Share
  • Text size

The Takeaway

With government budgets strained during the economic downturn, foreign aid levels are unlikely to rise significantly. That will make corporate contributions to social causes such as health and education in the developing world crucial. But companies have different ways of giving and different incentives. Social innovators need to understand these nuances if they are to successfully engage corporate partners.

It used to be that when I went to talk to companies about stepping up their contributions to social causes in Africa, I would be ushered in to the corporate social responsibility department. But times have changed. These days, I usually start with someone in business development—and may end up with someone in the CEO’s office. That’s because smart companies are starting to see Africa as an emerging investment opportunity. While more established markets may be sagging, Africa is fast becoming one of the most attractive regions for expansion—studies show current purchasing power on the African continent at $1.3 trillion. Indeed, the story of Africa’s rise may be one of the most dramatic and important developments of this century, and one that’s still just in the beginning stages.

But before robust markets can develop, many African nations will require help in addressing serious issues such as health, education, and sustainable agriculture. While aid from wealthy governments will continue to be important for these development priorities, given the global economic outlook, it is unlikely that funding will continue the strong upward trajectory of the last ten years. It’s crucial, therefore, that other actors step up. Thankfully, multinational corporations are beginning to do just that. Though corporate engagement in this regard is not new, the scale of involvement is. Many companies that have expanded in the region have brought with them a commitment to support the communities in which they’re now working.

To maximize the potential of corporate engagement, it’s important to understand differences in the way governments and companies tackle thorny development challenges. A typical government response is to provide aid in the form of cash and technical support. Companies, on the other hand, will look for ways they can tap their core competencies—for example, more efficient supply chain management or health care delivery—as well as their management and marketing skills, rather than simply writing a check.

The incentives for company involvement also differ dramatically from that of sovereign governments. In the past, rich countries often used aid as a way to forge alliances with nations whose proximity offered strategic defense advantages. Companies that engage with developing countries increasingly do so based on the prospect of diversifying their supply chains and opening up new markets.

Recently I met with a consumer products company that provided a good example of the ways companies can contribute. This organization has deep knowledge and insights regarding marketing to some of the most difficult-to-reach places on earth. A company executive told me that well-meaning non-profit organizations often ask it to transport health commodities like mosquito nets or condoms, which it can’t easily do because its supply chain is complex and highly decentralized.

Instead, the executive continued, his company would be better utilized as a consultant that could advise organizations on supply and distribution strategies as well as how to market products to consumers. Today, the Gates Foundation is working with this company on an initiative to improve the way health ministries in African countries buy, store, and deliver vaccines, as well as a strategy for encouraging parents in those countries to get their children immunized.

Another promising strategy for corporate involvement in development issues is a recent partnership to increase childhood vaccination in poorer countries. In June, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK government launched the GAVI Matching Fund, an initiative that matches corporate donations to GAVI1 up to about $125 million. Companies that have signed on so far include Anglo American, JP Morgan Chase, and Spanish bank la Caixa.

Like many others who work in the nonprofit sector, I’ve spent considerable time in the last several years figuring out ways to increase corporate involvement in issues such as healthcare in Africa and other developing regions. Too often, I’ve made the mistake of thinking of companies as financial donors when the real value lies in getting them to unlock their knowledge and talent to pursue solutions to complex problems. And increasingly, companies are willing to step up. Indeed, a recent UN survey of companies found that more than 70 percent of respondents said their chief executives were actively involved in development initiatives. This is a positive trend.

1Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, a Geneva-based multilateral organization.

Back to top

  • Comment on this articleComment
  • Print this articlePrint
  • Link to this articleLink to this
  • Bookmark and Share this article Share
  • Text size
Increase text size Decrease text size

Comment [2]

Agree? Disagree? Let us know what you think. Please include your full name with your comment. Comments may be edited.

  • While Joe is correct that business can make a huge difference, what is not needed in these communities are additional hoops to jump through. Businesses and non-profits that can transport and deliver the required supplies don’t need Gates telling them they need to work with a Multinational corporation. The “willing” need core funding from grant making institutions. If Gates really wants to make a difference they would operate much more like an incubator finding great “willing” people or organizations and small businesss, supporting them with unrestricted funding and nurturing their development with the funds and “consulting” they garner from the big corporations.

    This is what was so frustrating to me as Chief Strategy Officer of a women’s health non-profit focused squarely on creating a sustainable supply chain and markets in countries across Africa, SE Asia and Latin America. I would love the opportunity to help Gates develop a different model for addressing our most pressing problems.

    Posted 6 December 2011, 15:56 by Alan Hart

  • A timely and constructive piece. I would only add that there’s another, largely neglected way to encourage major corporations to get involved: start including their performance and positioning on major social and environmental issues as an important part of their assessment from INVESTORS.After all, it has been shown to be a robust proxy and leading indicator for their overall management quality, “strategic IQ”,adaptability, and long-term financial performance.
    By doing this, we can enlist the enormous power of $60 trillion worth of private investment capital in doing some of the heavy lifting.

    Posted 5 December 2011, 13:57 by Matthew Kiernan

Commenting is closed for this article.

Send an e-mail to let us know how we can make our site better.

Social Innovation: A What Matters Special Report: In Print January 2012 click here to request a free copy

Stanford Social Innovation Review

The Stanford Social Innovation Review is written for and by social change leaders in the nonprofit, business, and government sectors. Sample articles of particular interest to readers of What Matters are available  below.

08 Jan 2012 · 04:50:11 PM GMT
Dr. Parekh, We would be happy to collaborate with you and your organizations to share your stories of progress. I think you will also find other examples of affordable, quality health care programs in ViewChange.
—Wendy Hanamura

In response to Telling the world’s stories to promote change

23 Dec 2011 · 03:48:12 AM GMT
Agree. Data Analytics has been left as only a commercial corporate concept for a long time; with Governments only relying on a 5-yearly census to get key statistics.Social data as it is generated from social media is a powerful Risk Management and So...
—Mthandeni Mathabela

In response to Harnessing big data to address the world’s problems

21 Dec 2011 · 03:56:38 PM GMT
Gary and Matt, When I was a child in India in the 1950s, there was a question that was continuously being asked by those in government, universities, private industry and public-sector organizations: “How do we feed all our people, when we ...
—Ajay Bhatla

In response to Dare to be orthogonal

19 Dec 2011 · 01:44:09 PM GMT
Love your site and especially your name! Thanks for the awesome concept and great articles. I couldn’t find a share button to push it to Facebook or other sites aside from Twitter.
—Bryan Thomas

In response to Innovating for a better city

19 Dec 2011 · 06:53:53 AM GMT
I am involved with Engineers without Borders Professional Chapter and I have traveled to a few places in developing countries to work in providing clean, safe water for people in man-communities: Honduras, Guatemala and Ecuador. Having said that, ...
—Carlos Zhingre

In response to Dare to be orthogonal

18 Dec 2011 · 04:16:14 AM GMT
Innovation is just an euphemism for other stories. Extremely political as a “make believe.”
—John Dizon

In response to Innovating for a better city