Subscribe: RSS
  • Biotechnology
  • Cities
  • Climate change
  • Credit crisis
  • currencies
  • Energy
  • Geopolitics
  • Globalization
  • Growth and productivity
  • Health Care
  • Innovation
  • Internet
  • job creation
  • marketing
  • Organization
  • Social Entrepreneurs
  • Social Innovation
Mobile money: A game changer for financial inclusion
11 November 2011
  • Comment on this articleComment
  • Print this articlePrint
  • Link to this articleLink to this
  • Bookmark and Share this article Share
  • Text size

The Takeaway

The advent of mobile money allowed access to banking services to spread rapidly in Kenya, among people of all income levels. It’s safe, fast, cheap, and requires little in the way of infrastructure. Although Kenya was especially well suited for rapid adoption, mobile money could be rolled out in other developing countries, improving the lives of the poor and unbanked.

Analysts predict that by 2012, there will be over 6 billion mobile phone connections worldwide, with developing markets driving the growth; by 2015, Africa alone will have 265 million mobile phone subscribers.1 The mobile phone started as a tool for the elite. Within a decade it morphed into a household item and became one of the most powerful weapons in the fight against poverty. In Africa, mobile phone penetration has reached 52 percent—almost equivalent to one phone per adult—and the region is experiencing the fastest growth in the world. At the same time, access to basic financial services remains a major constraint to economic growth and poverty reduction. Only 20 percent of people in developing countries can access some form of financial services.2 Imagine if everyone who had a cell phone could also have access to financial services, and was able to save and send money safely, no matter where they were located.

That vision has become a reality in Kenya, and other emerging economies will soon follow. In 2007, Safaricom, Kenya’s leading mobile phone operator, launched M-Pesa (“M” for mobile and “pesa,” the Swahili word for “money”), which has become the world’s leading example of mobile money. Mobile money, which allows cash to travel as fast as a text message, is not an extension of banking. It is a new form of banking, just as cell phones are a new form of telecommunication rather than an extension of landlines. Unlike mobile banking, mobile money does not necessarily need a banking infrastructure.

Kenya now has 25.3 million mobile subscribers, which is more than the total adult population, and 17.3 million registered mobile money users3, more than 14 million of which are M-Pesa customers. M-Pesa conducts an estimated US $ 650 million per month in transactions, and according to World Bank and Safaricom projections, M-Pesa moved more than US $7 billion in 2010 and could reach up to US $10 billion in 2011.

Today, there are 30 million to 35 million mobile money users in the world, which means that every second person who sends money over a cell phone is a Kenyan. Mobile money is the rare case in which a poor African country is the world market leader and an exporter of innovation.

In Kenya, mobile money was the game changer in bringing financial services to the middle class and the poor. In 2006, before the advent of mobile money, only 20 percent of Kenyan adults had access to financial services. By the end of 2010, three years after the introduction of mobile money, that share had jumped to 75 percent (see figure 1).

Figure 1: The fastest expansion of access to finance in the world

Mobile money increased access to financial services for Kenya's middle class and the poor.

Source: Kenya Economic Update, December 2010 (World Bank)

According to a recent World Bank study4, mobile money expanded differently than initially expected. M-Pesa was intended to be a product for sending money home, for connecting the “middle of the pyramid,” which included many workers in Kenya’s cities, with their relatives in rural areas. In reality, mobile money was initially used by the wealthier groups of Kenya, especially in urban areas, but then spread rapidly into the middle and the bottom of the wealth pyramid. The clearest and most direct benefits of mobile money are greater convenience, far greater speed, and generally lower cost of transferring funds. In Kenya, mobile money enables traders and small businesses to reach wider markets thanks to its accessibility (there are currently 32,000 M-Pesa agents spread across Kenya), low cost, security, and convenience. M-Pesa has also empowered Kenyan women, giving them an independent place to store and manage funds. In addition, mobile money has improved personal security because thieves have learned that few people now carry large amounts of cash; most local businesses and street vendors convert their cash to M-Pesa at the end of the day for safekeeping.

Can mobile money work outside Kenya?

As a relatively poor country with a problematic governance environment, Kenya is an unlikely leader in the mobile money revolution. Many wonder why no other country has successfully replicated a mobile money system (with Philippines being the only partial success). Three main reasons explain why M-Pesa has worked well in Kenya.

First, Kenya had a large mobile money access gap. Almost everyone had a phone, but only a few Kenyans had a bank account in 2007. Kenya also had a high percentage of families living in different parts of the country, which fueled the demand for domestic transfers. In addition, the alternatives for sending and receiving money were unreliable and prone to leakage (sending via bus drivers and friends) or expensive (using money transfer services or the Kenyan Post Office).

Second, M-Pesa was conceived as a way to build a brand, not make money. It was part of Safaricom’s long-term strategy to retain its position as the dominant mobile operator in Kenya. There was an early understanding at senior management level that M-Pesa could not be an add-on product for just one segment of customers. There was 100 percent support to M-Pesa at the highest level of management and without this commitment it would have not happened. To be successful, it had to be rolled out at scale using Safaricom’s vast and expanding network of agents. Today, M-Pesa has reached a critical mass, with a huge network of both agents and users, which reinforces customer loyalty and reduces churn.

Third, Kenyan regulators took the objective of financial inclusion to heart and allowed regulation to follow innovation. M-Pesa developed outside traditional banking regulations. This approach permitted the growth of innovation with minimal barriers to entry. Today, mobile money makes it easier for the Central Bank of Kenya to manage the money supply and the economy because the bank can now monitor money that used to be kept under the mattress. The Central Bank credits mobile money as a driving force for the declining velocity of Kenya’s currency.5

How mobile money can change the world

Mobile money can change the world the way cell phones have already changed lives in most emerging economies. Mobile money has achieved what decade-long experiments with microsavings have failed to achieve: rapid financial inclusion for large parts of the population in poor countries. The difference is a low-cost transaction platform, which M-Pesa can provide. As with other innovations, succeeding replication will be easier and could also result in variations of the original model. In 2012, we may likely see a global tipping point for mobile money as many countries are introducing it.

Mobile money presents an unparalleled opportunity to deliver a basic suite of modern financial services to the “unbanked” millions across the world. The World Bank predicts that by 2020, mobile money could impact the lives of some 2 billion people in developing countries, heralding a new era of financial services where banking will no longer be the privilege of a small upper class. The mobile revolution, which has already reached millions of the poor, may well be the vehicle that that helps lifts them out of poverty as new and affordable financial products are rolled out in the next phase of development.

1Getting the right numbers,” Africa Confidential, 2011, Volume 52, Number 20.
2Access to Finance in Africa, Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP).
3Quarterly Sector Statistics Report, Communication Commission of Kenya, Fourth Quarter, April–June 2010/2011.
4Kenya Economic Update: Kenya at the Tipping Point? With a special focus on the ICT Revolution and Mobile Money, World Bank, December 2010.
5Keynote address by Prof Njuguna Ndung’u, Governor of the Central Bank of Kenya, at the 5th Joint CMA/CBK/RBA/IRA Board Members retreat (13 October 2011).

Back to top

  • Comment on this articleComment
  • Print this articlePrint
  • Link to this articleLink to this
  • Bookmark and Share this article Share
  • Text size
Increase text size Decrease text size

Comment [5]

Agree? Disagree? Let us know what you think. Please include your full name with your comment. Comments may be edited.

  • Their is no need of Any Mobile money instead one can have the Card bearing the unique number or Individual cards given by Governments named My National Money
    Money can be charged or transfered by any banks, post offices and even retails to the particular cards. And that card also have VISA or MASTERO to facilitate the withdrawing power as Debit cards , Credit cards ,smart cards or for any money transfer purposes.

    Posted 18 December 2011, 02:26 by Satish Krishnan

  • M-PESA makes our pay-per-use energy service in rural Kenya possible, however M-Pesa has many challenges that make it difficult to envision how such a service can be profitably deployed rural-Africa-wide, unless by a mobile carrier, who like Safaricom, can subsidize the high rural costs in exchange for increased customer loyalty and reduced subscriber churn (which they do enjoy).

    In rural areas, M-Pesa funds largely flow one-way; from urban areas into rural areas. Once received by rural subscribers, the funds are converted into cash and spent in small cash increments, typically below $1, and not put back into M-Pesa. As a result, rural M-Pesa dealers have a negative cash float and cash is constantly being distributed to rural M-Pesa dealers where distribution costs are the highest.

    The $0.15 transaction fees, which are minimal for urban-to-urban subscribers sending/receiving larger financial amounts, are too high to support the typical rural small transaction sizes. These transaction fees would need to be reduced drastically in order to promote rural-to-rural transactions and reduce the need to ship in cash.

    M-Pesa has other higher costs in rural areas. Subscribers game the system to avoid transaction costs. It is free to deposit money into your own account – so subscribers collude with the M-Pesa agent and say that they are depositing funds into their own account when in fact they are sending cash to someone else (which would require a transaction fee). M-Pesa has to do random checks and spends resources managing rural agents.

    It is difficult to image how such a mobile money service can be profitably deployed rural-Africa-wide without a dominant carrier who can justify these costs. With so much new competition into this space, particularly in urban-to-urban markets where transactions can be profitable, it will become increasingly challenging for players to justify the high costs of rural markets.

    We hope this is not the case as we rely on the service and would support protections for those players who don’t just focus on profitable urban areas, but who also serve rural markets.

    Posted 12 December 2011, 15:43 by Konrad App

  • M-Pesa has had a massive impact, but to say everyone is happy with the lack of regulation is short sighted.

    There is a vacuum in the oversight of the mobile money sector in Kenya, with the telecommunications ministry and the central bank both saying the other is responsible.

    This lack of accountability has allowed consumer rights abuses to persist. Many Kenyans use services like M-Pesa to hold money, but the sector faces few of the safe guards placed on traditional bank account services.

    So, for instance, mobile money users do not receive interest on the money held in their account, have none of the deposit protection guaranteed by traditional banks, nor the same level of protection against fraud.

    Posted 1 December 2011, 11:57 by Luke Upchurch

  • Your article does not mention the UK Government’s Department for International Development who sponsored the project for several years at its inception, and thus the article is potentially misleading in its message regarding the private sector’s willingness to take risks to develop solutions to social issues…

    Posted 16 November 2011, 05:08 by Gerry Boyle

  • Great article! This is very inspiring example of social innovation with a tremendous impact: a technical solution, easy to scale, hitting perfectly a compelling market need. Thanks for sharing!

    Posted 15 November 2011, 14:05 by Toni

Commenting is closed for this article.

Send an e-mail to let us know how we can make our site better.

Social Innovation: A What Matters Special Report: In Print January 2012 click here to request a free copy

Stanford Social Innovation Review

The Stanford Social Innovation Review is written for and by social change leaders in the nonprofit, business, and government sectors. Sample articles of particular interest to readers of What Matters are available  below.

08 Jan 2012 · 04:50:11 PM GMT
Dr. Parekh, We would be happy to collaborate with you and your organizations to share your stories of progress. I think you will also find other examples of affordable, quality health care programs in ViewChange.
—Wendy Hanamura

In response to Telling the world’s stories to promote change

23 Dec 2011 · 03:48:12 AM GMT
Agree. Data Analytics has been left as only a commercial corporate concept for a long time; with Governments only relying on a 5-yearly census to get key statistics.Social data as it is generated from social media is a powerful Risk Management and So...
—Mthandeni Mathabela

In response to Harnessing big data to address the world’s problems

21 Dec 2011 · 03:56:38 PM GMT
Gary and Matt, When I was a child in India in the 1950s, there was a question that was continuously being asked by those in government, universities, private industry and public-sector organizations: “How do we feed all our people, when we ...
—Ajay Bhatla

In response to Dare to be orthogonal

19 Dec 2011 · 01:44:09 PM GMT
Love your site and especially your name! Thanks for the awesome concept and great articles. I couldn’t find a share button to push it to Facebook or other sites aside from Twitter.
—Bryan Thomas

In response to Innovating for a better city

19 Dec 2011 · 06:53:53 AM GMT
I am involved with Engineers without Borders Professional Chapter and I have traveled to a few places in developing countries to work in providing clean, safe water for people in man-communities: Honduras, Guatemala and Ecuador. Having said that, ...
—Carlos Zhingre

In response to Dare to be orthogonal

18 Dec 2011 · 04:16:14 AM GMT
Innovation is just an euphemism for other stories. Extremely political as a “make believe.”
—John Dizon

In response to Innovating for a better city