Subscribe: RSS
  • Biotechnology
  • Cities
  • Climate change
  • Credit crisis
  • currencies
  • Energy
  • Geopolitics
  • Globalization
  • Growth and productivity
  • Health Care
  • Innovation
  • Internet
  • job creation
  • marketing
  • Organization
  • Social Entrepreneurs
  • Social Innovation
Topic: Social entrepreneurs
Tipping the world: The power of collaborative entrepreneurship
8 April 2010
  • Comment on this articleComment
  • Print this articlePrint
  • Link to this articleLink to this
  • Bookmark and Share this article Share
  • Text size

To question whether social entrepreneurs can achieve large-scale change is to doubt the existence of Florence Nightingale, Maria Montessori, William Wilberforce, Fazle Abed, Jimmy Wales, or the 2,700 Ashoka Fellows!

After all, what defines the true social entrepreneur is that he or she simply cannot come to rest in life until his or her vision has become the new pattern societywide. Scholars and artists are satisfied when they express an idea. Professionals are when they serve a client well, and managers are when their organization succeeds. None of this much interests the entrepreneur. The life purpose of the true social entrepreneur is to change the world.

Ashoka creates detailed life histories of every serious candidate it considers for election into its world community of leading social entrepreneurs. We have learned to look for this central, gyroscope-like quality because it is so predictive of who will ultimately meet our standard for election, which is to create at least continental-scale pattern change in an important field such as the environment or human rights. This gyroscope kicks in as far back as childhood and continues to define the social entrepreneur’s life decade after decade.

Once one understands this life-defining drive, a good many other characteristics of the true entrepreneur become obvious. They focus everyday on the “how to” questions. How are they going to get from here to their ultimate goal? How are they going to deal with this opportunity or that barrier? How are the pieces going to fit together? They are engineers, not poets.

For the same reason, they are attentive listeners and they are highly realistic. If something is not working, they want to know right away—and they will then proceed to change either the environment and/or their idea.

The entrepreneur’s job is not to take an idea and then implement it. That is what franchisees do. The entrepreneur is building something that is entirely new—by constantly creating and testing and recreating and then testing and recreating again.

The true social entrepreneur also has an almost magical ability to move people, a power rooted in exceptional ethical fiber. He or she is always asking people to do things that are unreasonable—and people do them. The transaction starts with the other person knowing that he or she can trust the entrepreneur and then realizing that the entrepreneur and the idea are utterly fused—which is to say that they can trust the idea as well.

Finally, the entrepreneur has an inner confidence that most sense but do not understand. While others think entrepreneurs are taking risks, entrepreneurs don’t see it that way because they have thought things through extremely well. They also believe in their ability continuously to adapt the idea as they drive toward a goal that they know is a huge win for everyone, and ultimately to reach that goal. They know, in other words, that they have the gift that brings the greatest happiness in the world, the gift of being able to give at the highest level.

Once one grasps who the true social entrepreneur is, one would have to be crazed to bet against him or her ultimately changing the world at large scale.1

Ashoka evaluates the impact of its Fellows five years after their election and start up. Several months ago, the Corporate Executive Board Company reported the results of a survey of Ashoka’s impact, which they conducted in 12 languages across the globe last year. The results were completely consistent with the results over the prior eight years.

  • Fifty-two percent of the Ashoka Fellows had changed national policy within five years of election. (The range over earlier years was 49 to 60 percent.)
  • Seventy-six percent had changed the pattern in their field nationally (on average 3.2 times) within the same five years.

These results are especially striking since five years is early in the lifecycle of the social entrepreneur.

However, these results only begin to tell the story of the social entrepreneur’s impact.

Every social entrepreneur has a second dimension of impact that, especially at this moment in history, may well be more important than the impact he or she is having in pursuing his or her immediate social change objective.

Every social entrepreneur is a mass recruiter of local changemakers. Here is one of the few significant structural differences between the social and the business entrepreneur. The social entrepreneur has no interest in capturing a market and digging a moat. Instead, the goal is, indeed, to change the world.

The way social entrepreneurs do this almost always is to make their idea as understandable, attractive, safe, and as supported as necessary precisely so that local people in community after community after community will recognize that the idea would be hugely valuable to their community and also judge that they could make that idea fly. The moment one or several local people make that decision, stand up, and champion the idea, they have become local changemakers. They will disrupt local patterns; they will recruit others to be changemakers; and a few will later become large-scale social entrepreneurs in their own right.

The multiplication of such local changemakers is critical for several reasons. They will provide a large part of the long-term grassroots leadership for their newly adopted field. These engaged citizens are also key to deepening democracy because, as they master the issues and become a driving force within institutions, they and their colleagues will no longer be able to be ignored.

Most important, this multiplication of local changemakers is a central contribution to the most important historical transformation in the structure of society since the Agricultural Revolution. For millennia the social structure has been one where a very few people “managed” everyone else. This is a model that worked in a static period when those being managed essentially had repetitive tasks to do. However, we now live in a time where the rate and complexity of change are both escalating exponentially. This new environment requires a shift in the organization of both institutions and societies to one of flexible teams of teams that come together around whatever change opportunities exist and then reform around the next. In this world, everyone must be a changemaker. That is because you do not have a team unless everyone is a player—and, in a world defined by change, to play one must be ready to contribute to changemaking.

Social entrepreneurs are even more powerful when they collaborate with one another and/or with their business peers. Ashoka has always known that its ability to contribute comes largely through the mutual help and collaborations our community makes possible. A few examples will give you a feel:

  • Even a few social entrepreneurs working together can be hugely effective. One Ashoka Fellow—Silvia Maria Carvalho, based in São Paulo—whose program transforms the perception of preschool from that of stigmatized warehousing to an important step in education, was able to turn trade union prejudice into support by working with an Ashoka colleague who employed large numbers of women to provide hot lunches in area factories by providing model facilities on site for their young children. An Indonesian Fellow named Iwan Nusyirwan spread a technique for growing mushrooms on wood chips floating in rice paddies, thus generating a new crop without requiring land, by sharing it with other Fellows looking for new job- and income-creating opportunities.
  • Larger collaborations are even more valuable — be it Asian Fellows collaborating across the region to fight the cross-national trade in women and children or twelve Fellows working together to change prison policies across Latin America.
  • Functional collaborations add further leverage. As security conditions have worsened, especially in Latin America and Asia, Ashoka’s mutual help Fellow security program has become more important, for example in connecting the dots to see danger on the horizon in Pakistan’s tribal areas. Similarly, at least in Asia, the Fellows have learned how to help one another when disaster strikes locally. And more broadly, because the child of a social entrepreneur has a parent who is possessed by an idea and who may work in difficult areas, finding an engaged and supportive peer group can be hugely important for this Young Ashokan (and his or her parents), in order to help him or her gain a deeper understanding of the entrepreneurial parent and his or her work.

Community multiplies strength and impact.

Thus far we have seen that individual social entrepreneurs and, even more, groups of them that come together for mutual help and collaboration, produce extraordinary results.

Over the last half-dozen years we have been developing something with even more far-reaching impact—collaborative entrepreneurship. There has never been anything like it before.

Ashoka is always seeking out and helping to launch the best new ideas in the hands of the strongest entrepreneurs on every continent—without in any way predefining the idea fields. (If it sought to focus only on the areas it thought most important, it would always miss the newly ripe areas that the next wave of entrepreneurs are just beginning to develop.)

However, once there are several hundred leading social entrepreneurs in a field across the continents, one can be confident that a jump to the next paradigm in the field is near. Given how centrally important it is to each of these entrepreneurs to be able successfully to change the world, they make these life bets of where to commit very, very carefully.

The challenge, of course, is to detect what the next paradigm or “S-curve” is going to be. The Ashoka community has, over the last dozen years, learned how to study the questions these pioneer entrepreneurs ask and also the patterns among their answers in order to answer that critical question.

Once it is thus clear where the world must go, the community then determines what one or two things must happen if the world is to get there—and somewhere between a third and a half of the leading social entrepreneur Fellows then work together to tip the seven to ten countries that are critical ultimately to tipping the world.

For example, the 500 Ashoka Fellows whose primary focus is serving children and young people have figured out that the old paradigm that defines successful growing up as learning the world’s existing knowledge and rules, while successful in a static world, is thoroughly inadequate in a world of escalating change. In this new world, all children and young people must first master a set of social skills that will enable them to be active contributors to change—empathy/teamwork/leadership/changemaking . The global team of leading social entrepreneurs must, therefore, ensure: (1) that every young child masters and practices empathy (see Ensuring Children Succeed in the Coming Everyone A Changemaker World [PDF]), and (2) that all young people have the experience of seeing an opportunity to improve their schools or communities, building teams to do so, and later realizing that they have changed their world (see youthventure.org).

What distinguishes entrepreneurs from everyone else is that their job is to change the overall patterns and systems of society. Can there be anything more impactful than a global team of the world’s best entrepreneurs who develop a strategy to tip the world toward a better future?

1Any doubts about the impact of social entrepreneurs are partly the result of two misperceptions. First, whereas 30 years ago no one knew what the phrase “social entrepreneur” meant, now there are a vast number of people who call themselves social entrepreneurs who are really wonderfully good-hearted managers or professionals or, indeed, poets. They have little in common with true social entrepreneurs. Second is the notion held by many scholars, foundation executives, and others that social entrepreneurs should behave like and be measured by the same yardsticks as business. Social entrepreneurs are trying to change the world, not capture a market, therefore the standard measures of organizational size and growth are inappropriate.

Back to top

  • Comment on this articleComment
  • Print this articlePrint
  • Link to this articleLink to this
  • Bookmark and Share this article Share
  • Text size
Increase text size Decrease text size

Comment [40]

Agree? Disagree? Let us know what you think. Please include your full name with your comment. Comments may be edited.

  • Dear Bill,
    I am a great admirer of Ashoka. Thank you for all you have done to start and sustain the organization!

    I have two questions:

    1. Does Ashoka provide some kind of training program for its fellows? Why or why not? Is it assumed that they have the skills they need? Are there training opportunities offered people who may want to be social entrepreneurs (especially young people)? Why or why not?

    2. Has Ashoka evaluated its model in terms of looking at the sustainability and capacity of the organizations created by its fellows? For instance, I am curious what happens when a social entrepreneur wants to move onto a new challenge, start a different organization, decides to work for the government, or whatever the case may be that results in that entrepreneur no longer leading his/her organization. Do the organizations created by the entrepreneur remain intact? Continuing the mission in an innovative and sustainable manner? In addition, to what extent do you find that Ashoka fellows are able to successfully transition into managing and leading organizations? I am curious about these issues because I see that Ashoka emphasizes the individual, and I wondered what focus is placed on the institutions these individuals create. With the fellow’s presence, would these organizations last?

    I come from an organization development background, thus my bias is towards creating and sustaining organizations/institutions. I see this focus as being complementary to Ashoka, ensuring that the work of fellows may continue long after they are gone.

    Thank you,
    Mona

    Posted 30 April 2010, 22:38 by Monalisa Salib

  • Dear Bill

    Many thanks for this inspiring article. I share the conviction that in order to truly break through old patterns, we need collaborative entrepreneurship.

    I’m co-founder of The Hub Zürich, part of the fast-growing Hub Network (www.the-hub.net) which seeks to enable collaborative (social) entrepreneurship by providing an ecosystem for changemakers to nourish and grow their ideas. Most importantly, though, a physical space where “unlikely allies” can meet and thus multiply their impact – both locally and globally. I wonder whether Ashoka and The Hub shouldn’t join forces?

    Warm regards from Switzerland, Michel Bachmann

    michel.bachmann@the-hub.net
    www.hubzurich.org

    Posted 29 April 2010, 04:35 by Michel Bachmann

  • This is a brilliant article Bill and the pdf download is an inspiring document. I would be very keen to discuss how changemakers can collaborate with members of my differencemakers community. I am based in Australia and would welcome contact from Ashoka Fellows here in the first instance.

    Posted 28 April 2010, 18:08 by Ian Berry

  • Dear Jeff,

    Your work at Family ReEntry and also its partner, Fresh Start, attacks a huge, huge problem. Given America’s unequalled proportion of the population in jail, and the degree to which this experience is formative for so many young people, it is hard to overstate the urgency.

    Let me suggest that you be in touch with Carol Shapiro, an Ashoka Fellow in New York City, who is a national and broader pioneer in engaging families as key actors in the task. You can find more about her and her organization at www.familyjustice.org.

    There is also a group of a dozen Latin American Fellows who have been working together to bring about prison reform (broadly and systemically defined), very much including significant policy changes. Here is an except from an Ashoka article that quickly summarizes this group’s work (at least up to where they were a year or so ago): http://ashoka.org/sites/ashoka/files/Prison_Watchdogs_in_Latin_America_0.pdf

    With appreciation,

    Cheers!,
    Bill Drayton

    Posted 27 April 2010, 15:35 by Bill Drayton

  • Dear Pamela,

    I love your focus on understanding the full person and all his/her interests!

    In addition to focusing on our colleagues’ broader social/business interests, let me suggest that engaging effectively with their children and young people is especially wonderful for everyone. The children of social entrepreneurs have a special challenge — a parent who is married to an idea as well as to the family. Moreover, the entrepreneur frequently works in areas that may not be perfectly safe, and he/she is subject to occasional bursts of criticism — both of which, of course, worry their sons and daughters. The power of these young people finding one another as peers with a similar challenge, not to mention their impact on the parents!, is extraordinary.
    With complete return appreciation!,

    Cheers!,
    Bill

    Posted 27 April 2010, 15:11 by Bill Drayton

  • Dear Wayne,

    Many, many thanks!

    We are, indeed, working hard on figuring out how to bring the full array of Ashoka services to China. We already have a number of Fellows based in Hong Kong and elsewhere who are operating there, but we have not yet established direct elections.

    We have also helped certain key pieces of literature in the field be translated quite excellently into both traditional and modernized Chinese, which has been helpful to the lively discussion in China.

    Right now, we have a series of Fellows who are visiting China, again to help build understanding for the field.

    Most urgently, we are looking for one or more permanent Representatives to help lead the overall program there. We would hugely value any suggestions you or others in this conversation have. Our criteria are: proven entrepreneurial/intrapreneurial quality; understanding and believing our core mission — helping build an “everyone a changemaker™” world; emotional and social intelligence; and exceptionally strong ethical fiber. Good English and high caliber are unspoken but real further criteria.

    Wayne: I am not at all surprised that, as usual, you and Calvert are helping lead us to yet more new frontiers.

    Thanks!

    Cheers!,
    Bill (Drayton)

    Posted 27 April 2010, 15:01 by Bill Drayton

  • Dear Archana,

    You are absolutely right! The legal system as well as financial services must travel a long way to adjust to the new reality of society and business coming together. Until it does, it is going to be a drag on the process.

    The law faces another huge challenge as the rate of change continues to escalate exponentially. How will the common law, which was created to adapt in a principled and non-political way to changing circumstances many, many centuries ago, deal with an escalating rate and complexity of change entirely beyond the imagining of those who built this extraordinary institution earlier?

    Bill (Drayton)

    Posted 21 April 2010, 14:01 by Bill Drayton

  • Dear Curt,

    The work you have set in motion, SAGE, sounds extraordinarily strategically targeted. And a really close fit with Ashoka’s Youth Venture and the 12 or 15 or 17-year-old who allows him or herself to dream a dream (a tutoring service, a virtual radio station, whatever). And who then goes on to build a team and leave a lasting contribution to their school or community and will be a powerful contributor and changemaker throughout life. Never afraid and, in fact, eager to seek problems because, to the changemaker, they are opportunities to contribute!

    With great appreciation for what you are doing here.

    Cheers!,
    Bill

    Posted 21 April 2010, 13:59 by Bill Drayton

  • Hello Bill,

    I very much appreciated reading your comments and the postings of the many others who added dimension to the “conversation”. I am heartened to know that there are so many thoughtful people and organizations represented.

    As a business person I would like to add a piece to the conversation that has yet to be addressed. The concept of taking the efforts of these great social entrepreneurs and engaging the world through communication efforts. We are really great at telling our story to those who are already engaged – but if we truly want to “light a fire” under the“Everyone a Changemaker” idea – we have to take the story to them.

    I have some ideas – and will work on getting a plan in place to take it to the next level however we need many more communicators to do the same. As in the book The Tipping Point by Malcom Gladwell – we need mavens, connectors and salesmen to take the great ideas to the masses to truly make global changes.

    Thanks again!

    With best regards,

    Gail Romero

    Posted 21 April 2010, 12:18 by Gail M. Romero, CFRE

  • Hi Bill! (from Wayne Silby)

    Want to emphasize the importance of your new initiatives in China. Many cultures come from some religious imprint of social values. Broader social responsibility is relatively new to China — it was considered the emperor’s role (mandate from heaven). I was giving a talk recently with some select Chinese social entrepreneurs here for the Clinton Global. Even I was surprised at my own words when I said that they represent the 2nd cultural revolution. Given China’s growing impact on the world, these young SE are really trailblazing a new change of attitudes that is evolving in China (witness unprecedented public support of earthquake). So, I just want to praise the special value of your nascent work in China [with Youncheng.org, and other efforts].
    Moreover, I was also with a serious group of Tibetan SEs at U Va, and whom we hope to find ways to support through Calvert Foundation. Let’s catch up some time! best, Wayne Silby

    Posted 17 April 2010, 12:04 by Wayne Silby

Commenting is closed for this article.

Send an e-mail to let us know how we can make our site better.

02 Jun 2010 · 04:37:10 AM GMT
Networks are the glue that increasingly bind us together (rather than class or geography). I think this is important to note because it is a new type of glue for a new type of business. For those looking to complement networking with a physical p...
—Jason Conner

In response to Social enterprise: It takes a network

28 May 2010 · 03:31:44 PM GMT
Thanks Raj for an interesting perspective. I disagree that social enterprises are at a comparative disadvantage to business. I think this is an old-fashioned, 20th century view. My favourite definition of a social enterprise is that they are...
—Garry Smith

In response to Social enterprise: It takes a network

28 May 2010 · 07:26:22 AM GMT
Social Enterprise can be a much better success if the participating entities share the same pain, have same vision and vow to work together
—Puneesh

In response to Social enterprise: It takes a network

26 May 2010 · 01:02:17 PM GMT
Congratulation on the first note of good topic. The topic coin like MBA oversubscribed agreed. “must compete in the marketplace and create social impact is an even taller order.” yes indeed it tough. but somewhere I must tell ...
—Ankur Sen

In response to Social enterprise: It takes a network

24 May 2010 · 11:02:22 AM GMT
I found this fascinating from the perspective that for a business to have a social mission, it must be presumed to handicapped in some way that must be overcome. Any business run with the welfare of employees and customers as paramount has a soci...
—Joan McClusky

In response to Social enterprise: It takes a network

24 May 2010 · 04:10:52 AM GMT
Great article: I like the use of Paul Farmer as an example (and how powerful is “TNTC” as a term?) and the impact in Haiti, and also on policy. For me, this is a welcome focus on ‘scale of impact’, rather than on ‘sc...
—Nick Temple

In response to Driving change: It’s not just about size