Text size
Visit The McKinsey Quarterly for a video interview with Jacqueline Novogratz and an excerpt from her new book: The Blue Sweater: Bridging the Gap Between Rich and Poor in an Interconnected World.
Beatrice Nguga, a wide-shouldered woman with a firm handshake and warm eyes, raised eight kids as a single mother in Kibera, a Nairobi slum that is home to more than a million people. In the 1990s, she buried each of her children—and their spouses. All had died of AIDS, leaving her to raise 12 grandchildren. She had no job and few prospects. “At one point,” she said, “I was so desperate, and the world felt so dark, that I could think of nothing but to beg for some money so that I could buy porridge and poison and end the suffering of myself and all of those children.”
When I met her, in December 2006, Ms. Nguga was overseeing the management of several businesses. She started by selling French fries. She then sold water in the slums. She added rooms to her house with the intention of renting them and started a butcher shop, a hair salon, and a restaurant, employing scores of people. Her youngest grandchildren were in school, and a number of the older ones had graduated from college. Today, she has 11 employees and 21 rooms, most of which she rents for income. She has reached this position by taking small loans from a community organization called Jamii Bora, repaying them in a timely manner, and borrowing again. Beatrice Nguga is a woman of integrity, strength, fierce determination, and faith in life.
Hers is a great success story, but what would have happened to her grandchildren if she too had fallen ill or died? In this sense, her story illustrates a larger theme: one of the greatest challenges in escaping poverty is inadequate health care. The resources, the technologies, and the knowledge to provide adequate medical services to everyone do exist. What we don’t have are innovative and efficient business models to deliver them.
It was to solve problems of this kind that I founded Acumen Fund, a nonprofit venture capital firm for the poor, in 2001. The fund, which invests philanthropic capital raised from more than 200 partners, starts from the perspective of people as users or consumers of services. We also believe that health systems must be economically sustainable and scalable, for only then will they reach the poor and the very poor. We invest in social enterprises experimenting with sustainable approaches to the delivery of health care and clean water, because we believe that integrating the creativity of poor people and the entrepreneurs who serve them is the most efficient way to find some of these solutions.
Solving endemic health problems will require a mix of public and private resources, market incentives, and large-scale public awareness campaigns. For conditions such as malaria, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis, the market gives the major drug companies few incentives to research treatments for low-income people. Fortunately, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has pioneered ways of intervening to ensure that this critical research is undertaken. Large-scale vaccination campaigns, like those that eradicated smallpox and are now on the way to wiping out polio, also play an important role in improving health on a global scale.
Innovative business models are essential if we are going to offer good, affordable health services to the world’s poor. My background as a banker has convinced me that to deliver social goods such as health care and clean water, getting the economics right is no less important than it is in any other kind of investment. At Acumen Fund, we buy equity in companies that we evaluate as offering such solutions. Any returns are reinvested in the portfolio.
Let me give you an example. India has one of the world’s highest rates of maternal death in childbirth, accounting for a quarter of the worldwide total. Acumen Fund became a joint venture partner with the public-sector company Hindustan Latex to create LifeSpring Hospital. This network of maternity and child health care hospitals provides high-quality, low-cost maternal services with clear and transparent pricing. At LifeSpring, expectant mothers pay 1,500 rupees ($35) to have a baby delivered. That is more than the official rate at public hospitals, which are supposed to be free though they often require undisclosed payments, but only about a sixth of the price at a private clinic.
This business model works because of the organization’s relentless focus on customers, not patients—pregnancy is not a disease. The simple rooms are clean, bright, and pleasant. Standardization allows the network’s facilities to average eight times as many procedures as private clinics do. This increase in traffic allows LifeSpring to use doctors more efficiently, so the network’s medical cost per patient is just a quarter of what a private hospital spends. LifeSpring’s innovation was figuring out how to deliver world-class care—it is ISO 9001 certified—at a price that many of the poor can afford and that also makes economic sense.
LifeSpring’s goal is to increase the number of hospital-supervised deliveries and to reduce maternal and child mortality. The organization plans to establish 30 hospitals across India over the next three years and will then evaluate a franchise model in hopes of scaling up rapidly to 150 hospitals over the next two. Each facility, with 20 to 25 beds and the capacity to serve 20,000 low-income patients a year, will provide comprehensive obstetric and pediatric care, as well as ambulance, pharmacy, and laboratory services. The hospital network has already served more than 25,000 low-income patients, mostly from families working in the informal sector.
Does LifeSpring serve the poorest? That’s an excellent question; for people making $2 a day, the 1,500 rupee cost is more than two weeks’ earnings, which can be a difficult sum to save. The company is evaluating how to extend its services to those who cannot afford even its modest charges.
By identifying business models that work for at least a large percentage of the population, Acumen Fund hopes to help lead the way in using private innovation to solve large-scale public-health problems. The fund’s $20 million health portfolio also includes A to Z Textile Mills, Africa’s largest insecticide-treated antimalarial bed net supplier, which produces 16 million nets a year and employs 6,000 women; Dial 1298 ambulances, Mumbai’s leading ambulance provider, with a service-for-all pricing model that gives free or reduced-cost rides to the poor; and First Microinsurance Agency (a partnership with the Aga Khan Agency for Microfinance), which aims to provide health insurance to 500,000 customers in its initial two years of operation as Pakistan’s first health microinsurance provider.
We are confident that this laboratory of investments will uncover innovative service delivery models that can be scaled up further through private, semiprivate, or public investment. The goal is expansive but not impossible—to show the world a whole new world of possibilities.
Text size
Commenting is closed for this article.
Send an e-mail to let us know how we can make our site better.
I think this article raises an argument of whether education or business provides the solution to poverty and related problems, including health care.
Posted 12 March 2009, 08:02 by Bo Zhang
First is the consicousness of health the so called poor people in india can afford to watch movies in theatre or entertainment of any kind rather than be aware of health conciuusness, we talk of tuberculosis treatment where the sputum of the patient goes untreated into the enviroment, let us talk about health education among health care workers how many of our health care workers take necessary care in prevention of the disease
Illiterate is the system with attitude of minting few rupees at the cost of health of others , talk about disposable syringe reusage , MDR tuberculosis there is no concious efforts taken. if work done it is done of others or for reporting only not with consicous
Posted 12 March 2009, 05:20 by natrajan.ganesh
Difining the poor is very relative and this changes with every geography.
Example given about LifeSpring, is very good and they seem to impress the media/ public at large. What is worth considering the other cost which are billed around $35 (consultation + medicine + diagnosis + revisit charges). Also important to understand that the real strategy working behind this might be to provide niche services (ofcource better too) along with skimming pricing policy initially.
Posted 12 March 2009, 05:00 by Ambrish Joshi
For the time being infectious disease is a major focus for so-called developing and poor economies. However, when thinking ten years ahead (which is the time required to develop new strategies) the number issued by the WHO indicate that cardiovascular disease will be affecting developing and poor countries by far more than so-called developed countries:
Reported in 1990
14 million CV deaths worldwide
5 million in developed countries
9 million in developing countries
Predicted for 2020
25 million CV deaths worldwide
6 million in developed countries
19 million in developing countries
“Race against time” by Stephen Leader precisely describes the cardiovascular epidemic in developing and poor countries and its economic consequences.
Potential solutions – like the poly-pill as proposed by Nick Wald and developed by Ranbaxxy are underway (at a price of 2 USD per month which is more than double of the average annual healthcare expenditure in sub-saharan Africa). A vaccine against hypertension in development in switzerland will require funding for phase III.
I am amazed that there is still no focus on the growing epidemic of cardiovascular disease in these countries which will require intelligent and creative solutions.
Posted 12 March 2009, 03:39 by Gilbert Wagener
I welcome comments from Keith and Estela. The real obstacle to acheiving a total eradication of poverty, are the non-sustainble solutions like feed the hungry, clothe the sick among so many ‘charity’ laden initiatives.
Mothers in Africa, die unattended to in Child delivery situations because ‘free’ hospitals are understaffed and totally corrrupt to the extent of taking a life.
These mothers are ready to pay anything for the survival of their un-born, even their lives. It therefore is no wonder that low cost medical services that are efficient can solve the twin problem of affordability and access.
When there is a need to be accountable, through affordable payments, service delivery to the poor will be more responsive and relevant. This will eradicate poverty!
Posted 12 March 2009, 02:41 by Wangolo David Ivan
People, however poor, are willing to pay for the healthcare provided they get good value for their money.
Most of the private hospitals in India are making huge profits most of that coming from poor families. Yet they are not getting good value for their money.
The solution to this jinx lies in collective bargaining and risk pooling by the people. For that they need to get organized around the issues of their health.
Posted 12 March 2009, 01:27 by Dr M R Surwade
I believe the Acumen Fund is doing a great Job.In my country, South Africa and in our Southern basin, helping alleviate poverty went exactly nowhere until we began to look at basic hygiene and quality sanitary services for the poor, including low cost housing solutions and access to water.
In the first example, I believe Acumen’s role of providing mico loans to be the one determining factor that we in our country have seen to be sustainable – often, given a chance in the right environment, poor people need the financial resources to provide for themselves and employ others.This is where we are in our struggle for basic human rights.
The engine of all successful developing countries is the development of strong entrepreneurial SME (small to medium size enterprises) sector that becomes the natural force of the economics of the country and assists the government by achieving a situation where poor people can rise out of poverty and pay for their own care.
Our traditional banks have largely failed in the space of micro and small business finance and it is up to the like of NGO’s like Acumen to come and provide better finance solutions to create a climate of sustainable entrepreneurial development, within a context of excelerated learning programs, expecially basic financial literacy.We have learnt this lesson the hard way after wasting quality resources that could have uplifted our people eons ago!
“TEACHING THE PEOPLE TO FEED THEMSELVES”, is the most sustainable strategy to employ for the future.
Posted 11 March 2009, 22:05 by Keith King
Good to note that there are people who pursue health care, hope and sustainable livelihood (as in the case of Beatrice Nguga) to the poor from an entrepreneurial perspective. I believe it is only through this mindset the need of the poor (as a market segment) can eventually be served.
Posted 11 March 2009, 20:30 by Jlteng
Love reading anything by Novogratz. The devil is in the details, especially in an international context. Would like to see more on how the evaluation is made to determine a partnership’s potential. Economical, I get. But, how are sustainability and scale-ability measured? How to scale the activities of Acumen Fund is a question itself.
Posted 11 March 2009, 18:55 by Karen Gulliver
I have worked in Sub-Saharan Africa and in Latin America and often found that poor people prefer to pay for quality health care and education services rather than endure long ques or sub-optimal state or free services. How to make quality services affordable and financially sustainable is a challenge but also the only way forward.
Posted 11 March 2009, 17:06 by Estela Gil-Alberdi