Subscribe: E-mail | RSS
Topic: Energy
Will oil demand peak before supply does?
23 February 2009
  • Comment on this articleComment
  • Print this articlePrint
  • Link to this articleLink to this
  • Bookmark and Share this article Share
  • Text size

The end of oil and the notion of energy independence command a great deal of rhetorical attention globally. Yet in all likelihood, oil will remain the largest component of the global energy equation for the next 50 years or more. Middle-class consumers around the world value oil’s comfort, convenience, and cleanliness; one of the first purchases consumers make when their income hits $15,000 a year is a car. Oil also offers high energy density, low volatility, and a nearly universal delivery infrastructure. As a result, the underlying demand for oil shows a strong upward trend, especially for transportation use.

“Peak oil”—the idea that the world is running out of oil—captured the markets’ imagination as prices pushed through $100 a barrel during the summer of 2008. As the National Petroleum Council report Facing the Hard Truths about Energy highlighted last year, oil is becoming a more difficult resource to develop: smaller, deeper, more geologically complex, lower-quality resources mean higher finding and development costs per barrel. With these geological challenges, combined with difficult access issues and accelerating decline rates in mature fields, crude-oil supplies will have difficulty growing much beyond 95 million to 100 million barrels a day, meaning the world will tend to face supply constraints when economic times are good.

However, the price rise from $80 per barrel to $145 per barrel resulted more from rising demand for diesel fuel and the investing appetites of commodity markets than from any change in the supply of crude. The economics of unconventional reserves, such as Canadian oil sands, would suggest that there are adequate reserves to meet transportation requirements for the next few decades. Today, the decline in prices to below $50 a barrel with the economic downturn makes it clear that we have plenty of oil for the near term. Still, underlying market fundamentals raise the question of which uses for oil will be replaced, and when. Oil demand, after all, wants to increase to 110 million barrels a day by 2020. But with shifts away from current use, could we see peak demand before the long-term supply hits the ceiling? In other words, could a variety of relatively small changes in use lead to a long-term decline in global demand?

Those who believe that oil demand has peaked point to the long-term decline in gasoline demand in the member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Increasing fuel efficiency for light-duty vehicles and the greater use of ethanol as a blend stock will reduce OECD demand for gasoline consistently over the next 20 years or more. In the United States, for example, higher fuel efficiency and ethanol blending will reduce the need for most gasoline imports by 2009. The United States could even become a net gasoline exporter as soon as 2010. Indeed, total OECD gasoline demand may have reached its all-time peak in 2007. Electric vehicles, shorter commutes, policy changes to limit city traffic, cuts in fuel subsidies, and taxes to reduce carbon dioxide emissions could accelerate the decline in gasoline demand.

At the same time, oil demand for power plants and industry continues to decline worldwide. Natural gas, coal, and nuclear energy all make more sense than oil for power generation, and as they become more available globally, the power sector shifts away from oil. Electricity and natural gas outperform oil as a fuel for industrial and heating use, so companies and consumers shift to the alternatives when they have sufficient capital. By 2020, oil demand for power and industrial uses will be declining to the point of insignificance.

In contrast, demand continues to grow rapidly for distillate fuels, particularly diesel in China and the Middle East. During the past decade, global distillate demand has grown rapidly—at twice the rate of gasoline. That growth keeps upward pressure on the price of oil. In developing nations, diesel literally drives GDP growth, providing much of the energy for producing and delivering goods. As the GDP of developing markets grows, demand for diesel grows apace. Diesel price increases lead to only half the drop in demand that occurs for gasoline. Subsidies allow demand growth to accelerate even in the face of high prices. What’s more, compared with gasoline, diesel has few substitutes as a transportation fuel, and the refiners’ ability to produce more diesel from a barrel of refined oil is limited.

For all of these reasons, oil will remain the world’s primary transportation fuel for some time. Clearly, we aren’t moving to a hydrogen economy quickly, and renewables are not on a path to replace oil in the next 50 years.

Nonetheless, underlying trends suggest that we could hit peak demand for oil well before we hit peak supply. Going forward, there are significant opportunities to generate positive economic returns from improved energy efficiency—higher fuel economy can have a greater impact on global demand than any other single factor. Oil substitutes are being adopted as blending components much more rapidly than as replacement fuels. The use of e10 (gasoline with 10 percent ethanol) across the system has had far more impact than the limited use of e85 (gasoline with 85 percent ethanol).

Moreover, improving the efficiency of vehicles (by making them lighter, with more efficient engines) and promoting oil substitution (through ethanol blending and electric cars) has the potential to drive down demand for refined products in the longer term, even as the economy grows. Policy changes that promote transportation electrification through the build out of plug-in-electric-hybrid and battery electric-vehicle infrastructure could accelerate these trends. Other steps could further accelerate the day when demand peaks. If the fuel efficiency of heavy-duty vehicles improves significantly, economical diesel substitutes develop, and diesel refineries become significantly more efficient, OECD demand for oil could peak before 2020. The growth in demand in developing markets could slow significantly too if rising wealth leads to the use of more efficient vehicles, increased oil substitution, declining subsidies, and behavioral changes as urban density rises.

Rising energy prices during 2007 and 2008 raised the possibility that demand was peaking as market choices and policy decisions in OECD markets led to increased fuel efficiency, greater oil substitution, and reduced travel. A combination of micromarket decisions and policy choices could make demand for oil peak as early as 2015.

Back to top

  • Comment on this articleComment
  • Print this articlePrint
  • Link to this articleLink to this
  • Bookmark and Share this article Share
  • Text size
Increase text size Decrease text size

Comment [2]

Agree? Disagree? Let us know what you think. Please include your full name with your comment. Comments may be edited.

  • Question: will the economic value of a unit of energy will remain similar, whether that joule came off a geothermal grid or a solar panel?

    Answer: No because the externalized consequences of energy will become embedded into the price of a unit of energy. We no longer just consider efficiency of price-to-output but also the consequences of the entire energy supply chain. In the short term, we will pay more for premium, better energy. In long term, we won’t externalize energy byproducts and will probably return to a energy commodity situation.

    Posted 7 May 2009, 12:38 by Alex Kelley

  • I got into the Oil and Gas Industry a few years ago, despite the intuition that the industry would follow its current, short-term boom, with a long term decline, because I believe that energy networks are more important than energy sources.

    If it is not Oil from Kuwait, it may be batteries from China, or Biodiesel from Texas. What will remain the same is what I call “Energy Networks”— the nature, and for the most part even the identity, of corporations that own and disseminate this energy will not change so much. It is therefore important to understand where the levers of advantge lie in these energy networks, and how power is projected along the value chain.

    Question: will the economic value of a unit of energy will remain similar, whether tnat joule came off a geothermal grid or a solar panel?

    Posted 14 April 2009, 08:54 by Hersh

Commenting is closed for this article.

Send an e-mail to let us know how we can make our site better.

14 Apr 2010 · 06:40:40 AM GMT
Communitization of the Power Houses is a nice idea and definitely looks like the Go-to way. And if We go a step further democracy lane then electron democracy can be at the individual home basis as well. I always had an idea of a energy self suff...
—Chandrika Rathee

In response to Electron-democracy

06 Jan 2010 · 06:21:10 PM GMT
I think that there is a big issue of more and more renewable sources producing irregular power transmission. The power generated by renewable sources is not controllable, and at best vaguely predictable. A system that has renewable energy at its hear...
—Naresh Ranvah

In response to Electron-democracy

12 Dec 2009 · 04:24:18 AM GMT
I can’t wait until half the desert is covered in parabolic trough solar thermal fields.
—Eric Kline

In response to Electron-democracy

03 Dec 2009 · 07:58:43 PM GMT
Since fossil fuel prices are going to be staggering high, especially after peak-oil, there would be a good reason to use those profits to invest in other durable energy sources. Either we have to nationalize the oil companies, or seriously taxate th...
—Rob Heusdens

In response to The end of the oil age

14 Jul 2009 · 02:57:03 AM GMT
The idea of a more democratized grid to be able to respond more quickly to the variations in demand for energy sounds like a viable option, but I belief that to be feasible only under the conditions of a more centralized control over the grid. In ...
—Henk Perdok

In response to Electron-democracy

20 May 2009 · 05:04:02 PM GMT
I really appreciate the thinking beyond oil. In Italy, where I live, the nostalgic desire of nucelar power stations has reached the irresponsible political level. But I’m asking: Does it make any sense to invest 10 billions Euros and 10 years t...
—Alex Colombo

In response to The carbon-free opportunity