02 Jun 2010 · 05:37:10 AM GMT
Networks are the glue that increasingly bind us together (rather than class or geography). I think this is important to note because it is a new type of glue for a new type of business. For those looking to complement networking with a physical p...—Jason Conner
In response to Social enterprise: It takes a network
28 May 2010 · 04:31:44 PM GMT
Thanks Raj for an interesting perspective. I disagree that social enterprises are at a comparative disadvantage to business. I think this is an old-fashioned, 20th century view. My favourite definition of a social enterprise is that they are...—Garry Smith
In response to Social enterprise: It takes a network
28 May 2010 · 08:26:22 AM GMT
Social Enterprise can be a much better success if the participating entities share the same pain, have same vision and vow to work together—Puneesh
In response to Social enterprise: It takes a network
26 May 2010 · 02:02:17 PM GMT
Congratulation on the first note of good topic. The topic coin like MBA oversubscribed agreed. “must compete in the marketplace and create social impact is an even taller order.” yes indeed it tough. but somewhere I must tell ...—Ankur Sen
In response to Social enterprise: It takes a network
24 May 2010 · 12:02:22 PM GMT
I found this fascinating from the perspective that for a business to have a social mission, it must be presumed to handicapped in some way that must be overcome. Any business run with the welfare of employees and customers as paramount has a soci...—Joan McClusky
In response to Social enterprise: It takes a network
24 May 2010 · 05:10:52 AM GMT
Great article: I like the use of Paul Farmer as an example (and how powerful is “TNTC” as a term?) and the impact in Haiti, and also on policy. For me, this is a welcome focus on ‘scale of impact’, rather than on ‘sc...—Nick Temple