Subscribe: E-mail | RSS
Topic: Biotechnology
The new biofactories
23 February 2009
  • Comment on this articleComment
  • Print this articlePrint
  • Link to this articleLink to this
  • Bookmark and Share this article Share
  • Text size

We now find ourselves at the dawn of a new age of direct genetic modification. Although the term “artificial life form” conjures up images of cyborgs or other creations of science fiction, the first such “artificial” creatures will actually be single-celled micro-organisms. Even though these human-engineered life forms will be extremely simple, they will have an enormous impact on our world. Their biggest potential: the creation of biofuels and biomaterials, which promise to transform our entire economy.

The first explicitly artificial organisms emerged from recombinant DNA technology in the mid-1970s; this technology was commercialized with lightning speed. As of 2006, biotech drugs accounted for about $65 billion in sales worldwide. Just one drug, Epogen, has generated $10 billion in revenues since its creation. A molecular biologist—particularly when receiving stock options in a biotech start-up—would have to conclude that life forms that become “artificial” simply by the addition of one gene can be quite commercially significant.

Revenues from genetically modified “stuff” now exceed 1 percent of US GDP and are generated in three areas: drugs, agriculture, and industrial products like enzymes and plastics. These areas are growing at 10 to 20 percent per year, and together they are making a sizable and growing contribution to the economy.

The biotech sector is also extremely productive. Between 2000 and 2007, biotech revenues added more than $100 billion to the economy, representing 2.5 percent of US GDP growth. This was accomplished by a biotech workforce of only about 250,000 people, less than one-sixth of 1 percent of the national workforce.

Yet the underlying technology is immature compared with that in other sectors of the economy. The majority of biotech products that have reached the market are the result of just a handful of genetic modifications and insertions. The commercial significance of the biotech sector will grow as its ability to engineer new biological systems expands.

Until recently, the complexity of these systems was limited in large part by the cost of development. The labor required to build and test a complex genetic circuit was prohibitive. But since the mid-1990s, productivity in reading and writing genes has been improving exponentially, and costs have plunged. Now relatively large pieces of DNA can be designed electronically, sent to a gene “foundry,” constructed, and returned via express mail in just a few weeks. It is already technically possible to build stretches of DNA as long as those of small bacterial genomes (about 400 genes).

However, this is not the fastest road to commercially significant organisms. This is because the simpler the engineering task is, the greater the near-term economic impact will be. That’s why aeronautical engineers do not attempt to build new aircraft with the complexity of a hawk, a hummingbird, or even a moth. They instead succeed by reducing complexity. Even the simplest cell contains far more bells and whistles than we can presently understand. Consequently, no biological engineer will succeed in building a system from scratch until most of that complexity is whittled away, leaving only the bare essentials. Real progress will come by adding to existing organisms just a few new genes—probably no more than 15.

Companies are already making substantive progress. Amyris Biotechnologies has modified yeast to transform sugar into useful compounds, including malaria drugs and biofuels that can substitute for today’s jet fuel, diesel, and gasoline. The company will begin production of these fuels next year in converted ethanol-fermentation plants in Brazil.

As biotech technology develops, biofuels and bioplastics produced this way will be easier and cheaper to make than ethanol or traditional plastics, and they will perform better than even petroleum-based products. Their manufacture and use will also reduce the carbon emissions that cause climate change.

Such artificial life forms will fundamentally change how we power the economy, bringing about a switch from fossil fuels to biological feedstocks like sugar, starch, and cellulose. Bio-manufacturing is less likely to be centralized, like petroleum refineries and ethanol plants, and will instead be more evenly distributed, like beer breweries.

Cars themselves might actually become the producers of the very fuels they consume. In the spring of 2007, researchers reported the successful construction of a synthetic pathway consisting of 13 enzymes from different organisms that can turn starch into hydrogen. This suggests a future in which sugar or starch—substances available at any grocery store—will go into our fuel tanks instead of gasoline. A fuel cell will use the hydrogen produced by engineered microbes in the tank to provide electric power for the car. Such a car would then become something of a cyborg, relying on living organisms to provide power to an inorganic shell. As one oil executive observed at a recent oil industry meeting, in this model “the car is the refinery.”

If this innovation comes to pass, a very different marketplace is likely to arise. The infrastructure for shipping and refining petroleum overseen by that same executive might become less relevant in a new biotech world. Moreover, if distributed biological processing of simple feedstocks can compete in low-margin markets like liquid transportation fuels, then it will also make significant inroads with higher-margin products like fibers, plastics, flavorings, and scents.

It will soon be possible to devise enzymes and organisms that “eat” a diverse array of feedstocks. One good example is municipal sewage. Now mostly treated and disposed of as waste, this resource will initially be used to grow unmodified algae. The algae will in turn be fed to synthetic systems—think of these as “artificial cows,” a fusion of robot and biology that is beyond even the “cyborg” car—engineered to make materials and fuels. Eventually, the algae itself will be engineered to directly convert sewage into products. And inevitably, these artificial cows will move out into the fields, closer to large-volume agriculture. Modern harvesting equipment is already often driven by autonomous, satellite-guided control systems. Imagine robotic harvesters equipped with bioprocessing modules slowly wandering around farmland, consuming a variety of feedstocks, processing that material into higher-value products like fuels and plastics, and delivering it to distribution centers. These hybrid “cowborgs” would thereby become autonomous, distributed, biomanufacturing platforms engineered to supply us with the fuels and materials that we need.

Very few organisms on our planet are larger than about one meter across. Most of the biomass production, and therefore most of the biological processing, occurs at scales of microns to centimeters. Although organisms produced by nature face different constraints than those designed by humans, we may find evermore inspiration in microbes, insects, and cows for our future production infrastructure. We have barely begun to tap the promise of biotech.

Back to top

  • Comment on this articleComment
  • Print this articlePrint
  • Link to this articleLink to this
  • Bookmark and Share this article Share
  • Text size
Increase text size Decrease text size

Comment [1]

Agree? Disagree? Let us know what you think. Please include your full name with your comment. Comments may be edited.

  • Robert:
    Thank you for this intriguing update on “bioplastics, cowborgs,” etc.

    The implications of such biotech developments are certainly immense. I find especially promising, however, your statement that “Bio-manufacturing is less likely to be centralized, like petroleum refineries and ethanol plants, and will instead be more evenly distributed, like beer breweries.”

    This scenario, if it catches on, could be the greatest single contributor to worldwide micro-capitalism of all—a direct link between agriculture and industry; it would give new meaning to the phrase “cottage industry.”

    Also, your brief reporting on algae suggests even a productive future for human waste, although the organisms themselves that facilitate the metamorphosis might be disdained as scum of the earth. They would nevertheless find their nanonic place in the neo-engineered universe.

    Carey Rowland, author of Glass half-Full

    Posted 21 March 2009, 15:38 by carey_rowland

Commenting is closed for this article.

Send an e-mail to let us know how we can make our site better.

09 Feb 2010 · 09:25:17 PM GMT
I read the article with great interest and sure enough it is far fetched in several respects and right on target in few specific areas. As a scientist who did extensive research in pluripotent cells and manipulated DNA and RNA and again as a Business...
—Booma

In response to How biotech will reshape the global economy

15 Jan 2010 · 02:55:03 AM GMT
Maybe its not a gene variation, but a rejection of the body? If they didn’t have this gene variation, maybe it would be lethal?
—Pharmacy

In response to Prognosis for personalized medicine

13 Jan 2010 · 12:28:50 PM GMT
Calestous Juma has done great job focusing Africa’s Biotech future. There are numerous neglected diseases in Africa and Future Biotech should aim at Point-of-care Diagnostics, cost effective yet quality biodrugs, and vaccines to tackle the pres...
—Niranjan Kumar

In response to Africa’s biotech future

28 Oct 2009 · 12:54:37 PM GMT
Development of biotechnology is an expensive venture that many African countries cannot afford at the moment, so what can African countries do to attract more investments from outside the continent?
—Tony Chang

In response to Africa’s biotech future

15 Oct 2009 · 12:39:43 PM GMT
This article is important and interesting. When I discuss nano and bionano with students of IT, they think it is not related to them. And, most have never even heard of nanotech, let alone thought about it. When I suggest they look for jobs in thi...
—S Conger

In response to How biotech will reshape the global economy

05 Oct 2009 · 01:27:36 AM GMT
as far as we know HIV/AIDS,it kills white blood cells.what if we look for a cartain ways of killing this strong virus like coming up with chemical which will not kill the cells but kill the virus.
—samson

In response to How biotech will reshape the global economy